Different Views on Affirmative Action Essay

This paper will hash forbidden the different views on approbatory action mechanism. I will go over both views of this issue, and will rationalise which side my individualal views deterioration on. I will also discuss the pros and cons of affirmative actions, and the effects it has on the workplace. In its tumultuous 45-year history, affirmative action has been both praised and pilloried as an answer to racial in equivalence. The affirmative action was world-class introduced by President Kennedy in 1961 as a method of redressing difference that had persisted in spite of civil rights laws and constitutional guarantees (Brunner, 2008). plausive action is a highly controversial policy that is designed to help minorities gain door itinerary to jobs and domesticates, etc. that they normally would not be able to enter into. Affirmative action generally means giving preferential treatment to minorities in gate to universities or employment in government and businesses. The polici es were originally develop to correct decades of discrimination and to give disadvantaged minorities a boost. The diversity of our veritable society as opposed to that of 50 years ago appear to indicate the programs have been a success.But right away, any(prenominal) echo the policies ar no longer needed and that they lead to more problems than they solve (Messerh, 2008). The benefits were precise great for minorities at one date. There was a time when minorities and women confront an uphill battle for equality in the workplace and in education. The volume of people believed that the better paying jobs should not only go to snowy men but that they were the better qualified candidates. Keep in instinct that all people have more sh ared than different characteristics, and no group is biologically superior to another.Nevertheless, racism, the belief that some racial groups are inherently inferior to others, has been common and is used to justify discrimination and equalit y (Lauer & Lauer, 2006, p. 225). This belief was spurred on by racism and sexism in the past. Focusing in particular on education and jobs, affirmative action policies required that measures be taken to ensure that blacks and other minorities enjoyed the same opportunities for promotions, salary increases, career advancement, school admissions, scholarships, and financial aid that had been the nearly xclusive province of whites.From the outset, affirmative action was depicted as a temporary remedy that would residue once in that respect was a level playing field for all Americans (Brunner, 2008). I think that this policy was a secure idea to begin with. There were many people back in the 50s who would go out of their way to make headway sure that blacks were not able to raise higher up their born into roles. At the time, a law like this was needed truly bad.It was very important at that time in our history to allow in every one of all races and sexes. I believe that we have now reached a time in our history, where inclusion is at an all time high nationwide. This brings us to the problems that affirmative action has caused in our society. The biggest problem is snow discrimination. Affirmative action leads to reverse discrimination. Affirmative action is designed to end discrimination and unfair treatment of employees/ assimilators based on color, but it in effect does the opposite.Whites who work harder and/or more qualified can be passed over strictly because they are white. Contrary to many stereotypes, many minorities fall into the middle or upper class, and many whites live in poverty. Unfortunately, the way things are set up now, a poverty-stricken white student who uses mark off and hard work to become the best he can be can be passed over by a abundant minority student who doesnt put in much crusade at all (Messerh, 2008).Many people do not sine qua non to admit to this problem however, affirmative action has created discrimination of the majority. If a person is a white male, they may actually be looked over for the primary fact that a university or company does not have comely minority employees. This is a discriminatory practice in the process. By the belated 70s, however flaws in the policy began to show up amid its good intentions. Reverse discrimination became an issue, epitomized by the famous Blakke case in 1978. bothan Blakke, a white male, had been rejected two years by a medical school that had accepted less qualified applicants the school had a eliminate admissions policy for minorities and reserved 16 out of 100 places for minority students. The dictatorial judiciary outlawed inflexible quota systems in affirmative action programs, which in this case had unfairly discriminated against a white applicant. In the same ruling, however, the Court upheld the legality of affirmative action per se (Brunner, 2008).I personally quality like affirmative action has also lowered the quality at bottom the uni versities and in the workplace. Affirmative action lowers standards of accountability needed to commove students or employees to perform better. If a minority student can get into Harvard with a 3. 2 grade-point average, why should she push herself to get a 4. 0? Although some students or employees are self-motivated, most people need an extra push or incentive to do their best, by setting lower standards for admission or hiring, we are lowering the level of accountability.We should reward hard work, discipline and achievement, we shouldnt reward a student simply because he or she is a certain race, nor punished because he or she isnt (Messerh, 2008). All positions regardless of what it is, is better filled by filling it with the best and most qualified applicant. The best tool against discrimination and unfair hiring practices, would be to make sure all of our lower, middle, and high schools are up to par in order to create the best applicants overall.