Morality and Responsibility - Moral Development in Mary Shelleys Frank

Moral learning in Shelleys Frankenstein bloody shame Shelleys Frankenstein is a exposition on the essential disposition of man. By personifying her spate of a intrinsic everyman office in the form of schoolmaster Frankensteins creation, The wight, Shelley explores the natural call forth as advantageously as the moral development of man, and develops conclusions regarding both. only when before Shelley could create her commentary on mans natural dispositions, she was in bring of a percentage to counterbalance her natural everyman. The character she needed had to take the same qualities as that of a man in his nigh natural state. The most common character to represent man in his most natural state is that of a tenderborn. A refreshful(a)born is, of course, a new human being in every respect, and a young has no past experiences that would taint his billet as a natural everyman. However, a newborn is subject to the elements of the impertinent world without the abili ty to freely move with those elements. A newborn cannot affirm itself from alien environments that bring in new ideas, new friends, new enemies, and new challenges. Shelleys character must be open to always act upon his have got free will (or be freely influenced by deterministic processes, depending on ones school or thought). However, a newborn is not able to touch this there is too much ambiguity in what determines and develops a newborns state of mind. Shelley needed something better than a newborn. Victor Frankensteins creation is the answer to his dilemma. The Creature does not possess any of the shortcomings discussed above. He is brought into this world as a fully mobile human, able to act, as he chooses, not strung-out upon other human beings to survive. In The Creature, Shelley ... .... Chapter 15. 4. Shelley. Chapter 16. 5. Shelley. earn 2. 6. Shelley. Chapter 21. Works Cited and Consulted Bloom, Harold. Mary Shellys Frankenstein. stark naked York Chelsea, 19 87. Garber, Frederick. The Autonomy of the Self from Richardson to Huysmans. Princeton Princeton University pack, 1982. Marder, Daniel. Exiles at pedestal A Story of lit in Nineteenth Century America. Lanham University Press of America, Inc., 1984. Patterson, Arthur Paul. A Frankenstein Study. http//www.watershed.winnipeg.mb.ca/Frankenstein.htmlSmith, Christopher. Frankenstein as Prometheus. http//www.umich.edu/umfandsf/ sort/sf/books/frank/papers/FrankCS.htmlSpark, Muriel. Mary Shelly. raw(a) York Dutton, 1987.Williams, Bill. On Shelleys Use of disposition Imagery. http//www.umich.edu/umfandsf/class/sf/books/frank/papers/FrankWJW.html Morality and Responsibility - Moral Development in Mary Shelleys FrankMoral Development in Shelleys Frankenstein Mary Shelleys Frankenstein is a commentary on the natural disposition of man. By personifying her vision of a natural everyman character in the form of Victor Frankensteins creation, The Creature, Shelley explores the n atural state as well as the moral development of man, and develops conclusions regarding both. But before Shelley could create her commentary on mans natural dispositions, she was in need of a character to represent her natural everyman. The character she needed had to possess the same qualities as that of a man in his most natural state. The most common character to represent man in his most natural state is that of a newborn. A newborn is, of course, a new human being in every respect, and a newborn has no past experiences that would taint his role as a natural everyman. However, a newborn is subject to the elements of the outside world without the ability to freely interact with those elements. A newborn cannot defend itself from alien environments that bring in new ideas, new friends, new enemies, and new challenges. Shelleys character must be able to always act upon his own free will (or be freely influenced by deterministic processes, depending on ones school or thought). Howe ver, a newborn is not able to accomplish this there is too much ambiguity in what determines and develops a newborns state of mind. Shelley needed something better than a newborn. Victor Frankensteins creation is the answer to his dilemma. The Creature does not possess any of the shortcomings discussed above. He is brought into this world as a fully mobile human, able to act, as he chooses, not dependant upon other human beings to survive. In The Creature, Shelley ... .... Chapter 15. 4. Shelley. Chapter 16. 5. Shelley. Letter 2. 6. Shelley. Chapter 21. Works Cited and Consulted Bloom, Harold. Mary Shellys Frankenstein. New York Chelsea, 1987. Garber, Frederick. The Autonomy of the Self from Richardson to Huysmans. Princeton Princeton University Press, 1982. Marder, Daniel. Exiles at Home A Story of Literature in Nineteenth Century America. Lanham University Press of America, Inc., 1984. Patterson, Arthur Paul. A Frankenstein Study. http//www.watershed.winnipeg.mb.ca/Frankenste in.htmlSmith, Christopher. Frankenstein as Prometheus. http//www.umich.edu/umfandsf/class/sf/books/frank/papers/FrankCS.htmlSpark, Muriel. Mary Shelly. New York Dutton, 1987.Williams, Bill. On Shelleys Use of Nature Imagery. http//www.umich.edu/umfandsf/class/sf/books/frank/papers/FrankWJW.html